Lano Review
Our verdict
Lano earns its place on your shortlist for one specific reason: payroll consolidation at EUR 3/employee/month is a product nobody else sells.
If your Finance team is currently pulling data from three payroll systems each month to answer a single headcount cost question, that line item alone changes the buying case.
The 100% partner entity model is where it loses compliance-first buyers. You are trusting Lano to vet in-country partners, and your General Counsel will notice. For EU-centric mixed-workforce teams it earns the demo slot; for buyers who need owned-entity employment relationships, it does not.
Best for EU-centric payroll consolidation.
Lano is a Berlin-based platform that does something most EOR providers do not attempt: it consolidates payroll data from your EOR hires, your own entities, and your third-party payroll providers into a single dashboard.
Payroll consolidation starts at EUR 3/employee/month.
If your Finance team spends the first week of every month reconciling payroll data across three different providers, that product alone puts Lano on the shortlist.
Lano sits alongside every provider Whichapp covers. Where Deel and Remote compete on product breadth and owned-entity compliance, Lano competes on aggregation.
What Is Lano and How Does It Work?
Lano is a European payroll platform built around a single awkward truth: most companies manage workforce data in three different systems and spend days each month trying to make sense of it.
The payroll consolidation layer (EUR 3/employee/month) solves a problem no other major provider targets directly.
Lano is a Berlin-based workforce platform founded in 2018. It runs four core products: Employer of Record at EUR 499/employee/month, multi-country payroll outsourcing from EUR 19/employee/month, contractor management at EUR 19/contractor/month, and, uniquely, a payroll consolidation layer at EUR 3/employee/month.
The consolidation layer is the part you cannot buy elsewhere. It pulls data from Lano's own EOR and payroll services and from your existing third-party payroll providers into a single dashboard. If your operation already runs ADP in one region, a local provider in another, and your own entity payroll in a third, Lano sits on top and gives Finance one set of numbers to work from.
What Lano Does
That consolidation happens at EUR 3 per employee per month.
Who Lano Is Designed For
The primary buyer is a mid-market European company running a mixed workforce: EOR hires in two or three jurisdictions, contractors across five or six, and own-entity employees in the home market. The payroll consolidation product earns its keep when your Finance team is already pulling data from three or more systems each month. That is the operational pain Lano was built around, and it is the lens through which every other feature should be judged.
A secondary fit is European-based teams where contractor pricing matters. EUR 19/contractor/month against Deel's USD 49 is a material gap at 50+ contractors. For a 100-contractor workforce, that is roughly EUR 36,000 per year back into the budget.
If your contractor headcount is below 20, the saving rarely justifies the platform trade-offs against Deel.
How Lano Setup Works
Platform integration (connecting existing payroll systems, mapping data fields, configuring reporting) requires hands-on setup work.
The payroll consolidation setup involves API connections or file imports from your existing providers.
Your implementation will stall exactly where you expect: waiting for the third-party payroll provider to grant API access. Budget three weeks, not one.
Lano Review at a Glance
| Whichapp score | 7.3/ 10 (provider index, updated June 2026) |
|---|---|
| Best for | Best for EU-centric payroll consolidation |
| Countries covered | 170+ |
| EOR pricing | From EUR 499/month |
| Pricing transparency | High |
| Coverage model | Aggregator |
| Integration depth | High |
| Security disclosure | Moderate |
Composite score across pricing transparency, coverage model, integration depth, and security disclosure. Whichapp 2026 index, based on Deep Research synthesis. Indicative only, not legal or financial advice; always consult qualified local counsel before acting on any data shown.
How Lano scores on the Whichapp Index
| Coverage model | Aggregator · 170+ countries |
|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | High · from EUR 499/month |
| Integration depth | High |
| Security & compliance | Moderate |
Composite is a weighted index across these verified dimensions — see methodology.
Key Facts
| EOR pricing | From EUR 499/employee/month, volume discounts to 20% |
|---|---|
| Contractor pricing | EUR 19/contractor/month |
| Payroll consolidation | EUR 3/employee/month (unique product) |
| Country coverage | 170+ countries via partner network |
| Entity model | 100% partners (no owned entities) |
| Founded | 2018, Berlin-based |
Source: lano.io, verified June 2026
What does Lano actually offer?
Lano offers four main products, each priced separately with the option to combine them for workforce management across multiple countries and employment types.
If your Finance team currently maintains a master spreadsheet that pulls from three different systems each month, this product replaces that manual work.
What Lano features matter in practice?
Multi-currency wallet: Free local payments in 50+ currencies through regional banking networks. SWIFT transfers available at EUR 25/transaction when local networks are unavailable.
Consolidated reporting: Unified dashboards showing workforce costs, headcount, and compliance status across all employment types and countries. Custom reporting available.
The magic happens when you can answer “What’s our total cost per employee in Germany?” without opening three systems.
Account management: Dedicated account managers for each client. Lano claims 40% faster human support resolution than industry average (company claim, not independently verified).
Partner network management: Multiple partner options per country with ability to switch partners if performance issues arise. Direct choice of in-country partner for EOR services.
Data security: Lano holds SOC 2 Type II certification, achieved in May 2024, the audited standard a buyer’s security team actually asks for, covering security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy. It is GDPR-compliant and encrypts data in transit and at rest, using TLS 1.2 and AES-256. For a platform routing payroll and bank-payment data across dozens of in-country partners, that independent attestation is the reassurance your InfoSec reviewer will want before sign-off.
Notable absences: No dedicated HRIS platform, no mobile app (browser-based only), limited integration ecosystem compared to Deel or Remote, no IT management or immigration services.
Your employees will ask about the mobile app. There isn’t one.
What does Lano actually cost?
Lano is a payroll-first platform with a modular pricing structure that puts EOR, multi-country payroll and contractor management on separate lines. The €499 EOR floor varies by country and the €25 per-payment SWIFT fee is the line most consolidated quotes leave out; here is what to confirm before signing.
| Employer of Record | From €499per employee / month (varies by country) |
|---|---|
| Multi-country payroll | €19per employee / month |
| Contractor management | €19per contractor / month |
| Payroll consolidation | €3per employee / month |
| SWIFT transfer (per payment) | €25where local network unavailable |
Pricing at a glance, updated June 2026.
What the headline price leaves out
SWIFT transfer fee per payment, not per month. Lano charges €25 per SWIFT transfer in countries without a local payment network. If you pay a 5-person team monthly through SWIFT, that is €1,500 a year on payments alone. Confirm whether each of your target countries is on the local-network list or routes via SWIFT before you size the contract.
EOR rate varies meaningfully by country. The €499 starting rate is the European-market figure. Independent reviewers report effective rates from €300 to €550 depending on jurisdiction, with the €499 published number sitting mid-band rather than at the floor. Get a country-specific quote in writing before comparing to Deel or Remote at $599.
Modular pricing rewards consolidated buying. Each Lano product is priced separately: EOR, multi-country payroll, contractor management and consolidation are all line items. That is excellent for a buyer who needs payroll-only or contractor-only, but it makes the all-in cost for a full EOR + payroll deployment fiddly to model. Get a bundled quote that totals all modules you will actually use.
Before you sign, ask Lano to confirm in writing:
01. The exact EOR quote per target country, not the €499 starting rate.
02. Which of your target pay corridors use local network and which route via SWIFT at €25 per payment.
03. Bundled quote covering EOR, multi-country payroll, contractor management and any consolidation needed.
04. FX margin per currency corridor and whether the rate is fixed monthly or floating.
05. Notice period, minimum contract term, and severance pass-through exposure.
Request Lano pricing →Whichapp may earn a commission if you book a demo through our links. Reviews remain editorially independent.
How does Lano's compliance model hold up across key markets?
Your Legal team will have opinions about this.
Lano’s Entity Model
With owned-entity providers like Remote, you deal with one counterparty.
Coverage for Specific Use Cases
Picture the moment your General Counsel asks: “So who actually employs our people?” With Lano, the answer varies by country.
What is the Lano platform and support experience like?
Lano emphasises human support over self-service features.
The bottleneck? Getting API credentials from your existing payroll provider. They’re never enthusiastic about helping you consolidate away from their platform.
Lano Platform
If your team expects the polish of Deel’s interface, prepare them for something more functional than beautiful.
Lano Customer Support
The moment you need clarification on German social insurance calculations, you’ll understand why that three-party coordination matters.
What are Lano customers actually saying?
What Lano Users Praise
Support responsiveness: Account managers receive positive mentions for accessibility and knowledge. Users appreciate human support rather than chatbot-first customer service.
Common Lano Complaints
One reviewer put it plainly: “It works, but it’s not pretty.”
Limited integration ecosystem: Reviews mention fewer native integrations compared to Deel or Remote, requiring more manual data handling or custom API work.
Your tech team will need to build what Deel would provide out of the box.
What are Lano's genuine strengths and limitations?
Lano’s strengths cluster around cost efficiency and workforce aggregation, while weaknesses centre on platform depth and compliance assurance structures.
Pros
- Unique payroll consolidation product at EUR 3/employee/month. No other major provider offers comparable data aggregation across multiple payroll providers as a standalone service.
- Competitive contractor pricing at EUR 19/month versus Deel’s USD 49 or Remote’s USD 29. Annual savings for contractor-heavy teams can reach thousands of euros.
- Account management included at standard pricing levels. Dedicated account managers rather than tiered support structures.
- Partner switching flexibility allows moving between in-country partners if performance issues arise without leaving the platform entirely.
Cons
- 100% partner-based entity model transfers compliance assurance from Lano to local partners. No owned entities for buyers requiring direct contractual control.
- Limited review footprint with approximately 35 total reviews makes peer validation and due diligence more challenging than competitors with thousands of reviews.
- No dedicated HRIS or mobile app. Platform gaps require additional tools for employee self-service, performance management, or mobile workforce access.
- Platform UX friction reported by users, including slower performance and less intuitive navigation compared to category leaders.
- Listed versus actual pricing gaps with third-party reports of EUR 600/month in some markets against published EUR 499 rates.
These cons compound. A platform with limited reviews, no mobile app, and variable pricing creates multiple objections for your procurement team to navigate.
Who Is Lano Best For?
Lano creates the most value for mid-market European companies dealing with workforce fragmentation across multiple countries and employment types.
The platform solves specific pain points around data consolidation and cost management rather than providing broad workforce platform depth.
Choose Lano
- Mid-market companies with mixed workforces spanning EOR hires, contractors, and own-entity employees across multiple countries needing unified reporting.
- European companies prioritising cost where contractor pricing (EUR 19/month vs Deel’s USD 49) creates material annual savings.
- Companies drowning in payroll reconciliation across multiple providers, EOR services, and own entities. If your Finance team spends the first week of each month aggregating workforce data from three different systems, Lano’s consolidation layer (EUR 3/employee/month) solves that problem directly.
- Teams comfortable with partner-based compliance models who prioritise coverage breadth and cost efficiency over owned-entity assurance structures.
Look elsewhere if
- Compliance-first buyers requiring owned-entity EOR for direct contractual control over employment relationships.
- Teams needing full platform depth including dedicated HRIS, mobile apps, or extensive integration ecosystems.
- Procurement teams requiring extensive social proof before vendor selection (roughly 35 total reviews versus competitors with thousands).
We’ve watched Finance teams burn 40+ hours monthly on this reconciliation. At EUR 150/month for a 50-person company, the math is obvious.
When should you consider a Lano alternative?
The right alternative depends on whether you prioritise compliance assurance, platform depth, or cost optimisation. Each major competitor addresses different aspects of Lano’s trade-offs.
Final Verdict: Is Lano Worth It?
The consolidation story is simple: if your Finance team burns a week each month reconciling payroll data, EUR 150/month for a 50-person team buys that week back. For a mid-market European company juggling EOR, contractor, and own-entity payroll across three or more systems, that is the clearest return on a platform decision we have modelled this year.
The partner entity model is the real risk. It is not a dealbreaker if Procurement is leading the buying case and cost is the deciding axis. It is a dealbreaker if Legal needs direct contractual control over the employing entity, because no amount of partner vetting gives you the same posture as an owned subsidiary.
We recommend Lano specifically for European mixed-workforce teams managing three or more payroll systems where Finance reconciliation is the named pain point. We do not recommend it for buyers who need owned-entity assurance, for APAC- or Americas-first expansions, or for procurement teams that require thousands of peer reviews to greenlight a vendor.
Lano FAQ
How much does Lano EOR cost?
Lano EOR starts at EUR 499/employee/month, with volume discounts up to 20% on multi-country packages. Third-party reports cite EUR 600/month in some markets, so request a binding per-country quote before signing. SWIFT transfer fees of EUR 25/transaction apply when local payment networks are unavailable.
Does Lano use owned entities?
No. Lano operates a 100% partner-based entity model across all 170+ countries it covers. Compliance quality varies by in-country partner, and Lano vets and switches partners where performance issues arise. If your Legal team requires owned-entity employment relationships, Remote and Oyster provide 100% owned entities instead.
What makes Lano different from Deel or Remote?
Lano is the only major provider offering payroll consolidation as a standalone product at EUR 3/employee/month, aggregating data from Lano payroll and third-party providers into one dashboard. Contractor pricing at EUR 19/month against Deel's USD 49 also creates material savings at scale. Trade-offs: no owned entities, no HRIS or mobile app, and roughly 35 peer reviews against competitors with thousands.
How fast is Lano onboarding?
Standard EOR onboarding runs two to four weeks per country, depending on the local partner and document turnaround. Payroll consolidation setup typically adds two to three weeks because the bottleneck is getting API credentials from your existing payroll providers, who are rarely keen to help you consolidate away from their platform. Budget three weeks, not one.
What should you verify before choosing Lano?
Confirm three things in writing before signing: the per-country EOR rate (third-party reports cite EUR 600 in some markets against the EUR 499 published rate), the named in-country partner and the indemnity language tied to that partner, and the per-jurisdiction setup fees that apply to multi-country payroll outsourcing. Also confirm whether your existing payroll providers will grant API access for the consolidation product, because implementation stalls without it.
Methodology and Disclosure
Whichapp is an independent comparison site for global payroll, EOR, and contractor management platforms. We do not sell these services and do not accept payment for editorial placement or reviews. We may earn a commission if you book a demo or request a quote through links on this page.
This review was produced by our editorial team and was not reviewed or approved by Lano before publication.
Data Sources
Lano pricing page (verified June 2026) · G2 and Capterra reviews (Jan–Apr 2026) · Lano help centre documentation and country coverage pages · Companies House UK / German trade register filings.
Research Approach
Assessed across EOR and contractor management capabilities, European entity network depth, pricing transparency across SKUs (EOR, contractor, payroll), platform usability and invoicing features, customer support model, and verified user feedback from G2 and Capterra. Live paid pilot was not conducted.
Tools to Evaluate Lano
Provider Coverage Lookup: check which countries each provider covers and compare coverage side by side. EOR vs Entity Break-Even Modeler: find the headcount at which setting up your own entity beats paying EOR fees. Employer Cost & Burden Calculator: turn a gross salary into a realistic total employer cost by country.
Whichapp Research used in this review
Pricing Transparency Index: how clearly this provider discloses pricing compared to the market. EOR Cost Benchmark: published EOR fee range and first-year cost context across 17 providers. Global Payroll Coverage Index: country breadth and owned-entity depth scored across providers. Integration Depth Index: HR and finance integration coverage scored by provider. Security Disclosure Benchmark: SOC 2, ISO 27001, and public security disclosure ratings.