Transparency research · 2026

EOR pricing transparency, by provider

How openly the major employer of record (EOR) providers disclose what you’ll actually pay: platform pricing, FX rate basis, upfront rates, multi-currency wallets and hedging. Verifiable signals are drawn from our 35-market FX dataset. Note that no provider publishes its FX spread, so the true cost of currency conversion stays hidden regardless of score.

Which major EOR providers are most transparent about pricing?

Deel and Remote publish a starting price; Papaya Global and Rippling route buyers through a sales call before quoting. The index scores all four on six signals, from published platform pricing to whether the FX rate is shown before you commit.

Dataset · 4 providers · 35 markets · 2026
ProviderPrice visibilityRate upfrontBasis shownWalletHedgingScore
DeelMost openPublished100%100%100%100%93
RemoteMost openPublished100%100%100%100%93
Papaya GlobalSales-gated100%100%100%100%75
RipplingSales-gated0%0%0%0%5

Score weights six signals equally: platform price published, FX rate shown upfront, verifiable rate basis, multi-currency wallet, FX hedging, and fee-line disclosure. Percentages are each provider’s share of its covered markets (Deel & Remote 35, Papaya 19, Rippling 29). FX rate basis, wallet and hedging are computed from our verified 35-market FX dataset; rate-upfront, platform-price visibility and the fee factor are Whichapp editorial assessments.

How openly do providers disclose FX costs across 35 markets?

For each market, how many of the providers operating there disclose a verifiable FX rate basis and show the rate up front.

MarketProvidersDisclose basisRate upfrontHedging
Canada367%2/367%2/3Yes
France367%2/367%2/3Yes
Germany367%2/367%2/3Yes
Israel367%2/367%2/3Yes
Italy367%2/367%2/3Yes
Nigeria367%2/367%2/3Yes
Norway367%2/367%2/3Yes
Romania367%2/367%2/3Yes
South Africa367%2/367%2/3Yes
United Arab Emirates367%2/367%2/3Yes
Australia475%3/475%3/4Yes
Belgium475%3/475%3/4Yes
Brazil475%3/475%3/4Yes
Colombia475%3/475%3/4Yes
Czech Republic475%3/475%3/4Yes
Hong Kong475%3/475%3/4Yes
India475%3/475%3/4Yes
Ireland475%3/475%3/4Yes
Japan475%3/475%3/4Yes
Mexico475%3/475%3/4Yes
New Zealand475%3/475%3/4Yes
Portugal475%3/475%3/4Yes
South Korea475%3/475%3/4Yes
Spain475%3/475%3/4Yes
Switzerland475%3/475%3/4Yes
United Kingdom475%3/475%3/4Yes
United States475%3/475%3/4Yes
Vietnam475%3/475%3/4Yes
Philippines580%4/560%3/5Yes
Indonesia2100%2/2100%2/2Yes
Malaysia2100%2/2100%2/2Yes
Netherlands2100%2/2100%2/2Yes
Poland2100%2/2100%2/2Yes
Singapore2100%2/2100%2/2Yes
Thailand2100%2/2100%2/2Yes

Why does EOR pricing transparency matter?

The headline per-employee fee is rarely the full cost. Currency conversion margin, deposits and off-cycle charges sit below the line, and no provider publishes its FX spread, so two quotes at the same monthly rate can settle very differently. Before you shortlist, read each provider’s pricing in full: Deel, Remote, Papaya Global and Rippling. The figures here come from our FX disclosure dataset and are scored using our research methodology. For the wider market, see the best EOR providers guide and the provider scores index.

Common questions about EOR pricing transparency

Do EOR providers hide their pricing?

Often, yes. Of the four majors in this index, two (Deel and Remote) publish a starting price, while Papaya Global and Rippling quote only after a sales call. Even published rates leave out the FX margin, which none of them disclose.

Which EOR provider is most transparent about cost?

Deel and Remote score highest, tied at 93 out of 100, followed by Papaya Global at 75. The score weights six signals equally, including published platform pricing, a verifiable FX rate basis, multi-currency wallets and hedging across the markets each provider covers.

What is an FX spread, and why does it matter?

The FX spread is the margin a provider adds when converting your funds into local pay. It is charged on every payroll run yet published by none of these providers, which makes it the largest hidden cost in cross-border EOR pricing.