Glossary
Indefinite contract
Employment contract with no specified end date that vests the full statutory employment protection of the country where the worker performs the work. The legal default in almost every jurisdiction outside the US at-will baseline.
An indefinite contract is an employment agreement with no end date that vests full statutory protection in the country where work happens.
For global payroll teams, the indefinite contract is the default the local statute forces underneath every offer. Outside US at-will, the indefinite form is the rule and fixed-term is the narrow exception that needs justification.
The label maps to the German unbefristeter Arbeitsvertrag, the French contrat à durée indéterminée, the Italian contratto a tempo indeterminato, and the Spanish contrato indefinido. Each form runs on its own statutory mechanic.
The trade-off the global sales contract almost always gets wrong is treating the indefinite form as one template across the footprint. It is not. Each country rewrites the contract to its enforceable form, usually narrower on restrictive covenants and stronger on termination protection than the global template assumes.
What does the indefinite contract mean in payroll?
In payroll, the indefinite contract is the input that drives every downstream accrual and termination calculation. The statutory form decides what payroll has to carry on the balance sheet from day one.
Termination protection that accrues with tenure
The worker at one year is harder to dismiss than a probationary hire, and the worker at ten years is harder still.
Statutory notice scales with service in most jurisdictions: German BGB §622 lengthens from one month to seven months, French notice scales by Syntec grade and tenure, and Italian notice runs on CCNL bands. See the notice period entry for the country-by-country scales.
Statutory benefits that accrue across the engagement
Severance, vacation, and 13th-salary obligations build up monthly under the indefinite contract.
Italy's TFR runs at 7.41% of annual gross. Brazil's FGTS runs at 8% of monthly salary. The accruing liability lands on your audited accounts every month, whether or not anyone leaves.
The local form the EOR actually signs
The EOR signs the local statutory form, not the global template. Mandatory clauses get inserted: probation under BGB §622, Syntec grade in France, CCNL assignment in Italy, labour-card alignment in the UAE.
Restrictive covenants, garden-leave, and IP assignment get rewritten to the local enforceability standard. The gap between your global sales contract and that local employment contract is where most surprise exposure sits.
How does the indefinite contract default vary across countries?
Outside the US, almost every major payroll market treats indefinite employment as the legal default and fixed-term as the narrow exception that needs justification.
| Country | Local label | Default contract form | Buyer check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | Unbefristeter Arbeitsvertrag | Indefinite, with Kündigungsschutz from month 7 | Has BGB §622 notice scale been applied? |
| France | Contrat à durée indéterminée (CDI) | Indefinite, with CCN coverage and cause réelle | Has Syntec grade been assigned? |
| Italy | Contratto a tempo indeterminato | Indefinite, with TFR accrual and CCNL bands | Is the correct CCNL applied? |
| Brazil | Contrato por prazo indeterminado | Indefinite, with FGTS and aviso prévio | Has FGTS 8% deposit been registered? |
| Japan | Mugen koyo | Presumed indefinite unless explicit fixed-term | Is mugen tenkan exposure tracked at month 60? |
| UK | Permanent employment | Indefinite by convention; unfair-dismissal at 24 months | Does the contract include statutory minimum notice? |
| US (federal) | At-will (no formal label) | At-will is federal default; only Montana departs | Is the state-specific exception modelled? |
The EU operates this way uniformly under Directive 1999/70/EC, which requires member states to prevent abusive use of successive fixed-term contracts. Latin America runs on the same logic: Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, and Chile default to indefinite with statutory severance and notice.
The US sits alone. At-will is the federal default: either party can terminate at any time, for any lawful reason, with no statutory notice or severance. A global headcount plan that maps US at-will logic onto roles in any of the other jurisdictions does not match the contract you actually sign locally.
When does a fixed-term contract convert to indefinite?
Most jurisdictions outside US at-will treat the fixed-term as the exception and force conversion to indefinite when statutory limits break. Triggers cluster around four mechanisms: total duration cap, renewal count, statutory ground exhaustion, and continuous-service threshold.
| Country | Conversion trigger | Statutory mechanic | Carry-forward exposure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | 24 months sachgrundlos cap, 3 renewals max | TzBfG §14(2) and §16 auto-convert to unbefristet | Notice and severance from original start date |
| France | 18-month cap, 2 renewals max | L1243-13 converts to CDI plus 10% indemnité de précarité | Indemnité plus retroactive CDI protections |
| Italy | 24-month total cap, causale mandatory after month 12 | DL 87/2018 (Decreto Dignità) auto-converts | TFR plus CCNL severance from original start |
| Japan | 60 months continuous fixed-term service | Labour Contract Act Article 18 mugen tenkan on worker request | Indefinite protections from conversion date |
| Brazil | 2-year cap, 1 renewal max | CLT Article 451 auto-converts to indeterminado | FGTS, 40% dismissal penalty, aviso prévio from start |
| UK | No statutory auto-conversion | Unfair-dismissal rights at 24 months continuous service | Same dismissal exposure as permanent contract |
The trap is timing. Conversion happens quietly: the renewal letter goes out, the worker keeps working, and the next exit or audit surfaces it.
By then the carry-forward severance, notice, and benefits accrual runs from day one of the original contract, not the conversion date. Audit files routinely surface silent conversions that claw back two years of benefits the cost model never reserved for. See the fixed-term contract entry for the cap and renewal arithmetic on the other side of this trigger.
What do buyers consistently get wrong?
The recurring mistakes cluster into four moves visible across procurement reviews and EOR contract redlines.
The first is mapping US at-will logic onto international roles. A global headcount plan that assumes "either party can terminate at any time" does not match the indefinite contract every other major market issues.
The cost line that should appear from day one is statutory severance accrual: TFR in Italy, FGTS in Brazil, indemnité de licenciement reserve in France. The model that omits the accrual mis-prices the engagement throughout the year, not just at exit.
The second is treating the global sales contract as the operative document. The EOR signs the local employment contract, not the master services agreement. Restrictive covenants, garden-leave, IP assignment, and non-solicit provisions all get rewritten to the local enforceability standard, usually narrower than the global template assumes.
Brazil narrows post-termination non-compete to 30 days. Italy requires mandatory consideration for 6 to 12 months. India makes post-employment restraints largely unenforceable under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act.
The third is the silent conversion trap. A fixed-term contract renewed past the statutory cap converts to indefinite by operation of law, with notice, severance, and benefits accrual backdated to the original start.
The fourth is reading the UAE post-2022 reform as eliminating indefinite contracts. Federal Decree-Law No. 33 of 2022 mandates fixed-term contracts capped at 3 years.
Article 9 treats most renewals as continuing the relationship, and labour-court rulings read post-3-year continuation as an indefinite-pattern engagement with the same termination and end-of-service protections. The statutory form changed; the underlying tenure protection did not.
What does an EOR handle on the indefinite contract?
The EOR is the legal employer in the country where the worker performs the work, so it signs and carries the local indefinite contract. The substantive decisions and the indemnity scope still sit with the buyer.
| Task | EOR handles | Buyer still owns | Risk if neglected |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local statutory drafting | Yes (CCN, CCNL, BGB) | Review pre-signature | Mandatory clause missing |
| Restrictive covenants | Drafts to local enforceability | Senior-hire side letter | Global covenant narrows on signature |
| Statutory accrual | Yes (TFR, FGTS, 13th) | Carry on balance sheet | Reserves under-modelled |
| FTC-to-indefinite conversion tracking | Yes (must flag) | Approve before trigger lands | Silent conversion backdates exposure |
| Termination procedural route | Yes (works council, convocation) | Reason and approval | Procedural defect on dismissal |
| Severance and notice computation | Yes | Settlement above floor | Tribunal exposure on under-payment |
| Restrictive-covenant enforcement | No (indemnity carve-out) | Buyer counsel | Enforcement cost back to client |
The five major EOR platforms diverge most visibly on termination clauses, restrictive-covenant scope, and the indemnification carve-outs that decide who pays when a contract goes wrong.
Deel ships standardised local contracts across the broadest country coverage with the fastest turnaround. The limitation is restrictive-covenant and senior-hire customisation, which default to the platform standard; executive placements typically need a side letter.
Remote emphasises clean local drafting and a transparent termination-cost breakdown before signature. The limitation is jurisdictions where Remote uses partner entities rather than owned ones, where the partner's drafting standard applies.
Multiplier handles FTC-to-indefinite conversion administratively well, with proactive flagging when statutory limits crack. The limitation is jurisdictions with strict works-council consultation (Germany, Netherlands), where the pre-termination workflow is less developed.
Globalization Partners (G-P) markets a fully owned-entity model with stronger contract-enforceability indemnification. The limitation is price: per-seat fees are among the highest in the category, and the amendment workflow is slower than platform-led providers.
Velocity Global handles complex senior-hire contracts with bespoke restrictive-covenant drafting and longer non-compete windows where enforceable. The limitation is volume placements and standardised junior hires, where customisation overhead lifts unit cost.
Whichapp view
Ask the EOR for the local contract text before signature, not at onboarding. The global sales contract describes the engagement in your terms; the local employment contract describes it in the statute's terms, and that is the operative document.
Match the provider to contract complexity. See best EOR providers for contract-drafting depth and best global payroll when the indefinite contract sits with your own local entity and you only need the multi-country payroll layer. The Germany country guide walks through the on-cost stack at the depth most procurement decks miss.
See our ranked shortlist of providers, scored across pricing transparency, country coverage, and contract flexibility. Updated for 2026.
View the shortlist →Indefinite contract FAQs
What is the difference between an indefinite and a permanent contract?
The two labels usually mean the same thing operationally: an employment contract with no specified end date.
Indefinite is the civil-law label used across the EU and Latin America; permanent is the common-law label used in the UK and Commonwealth markets. The underlying mechanic (statutory notice, severance, and termination protection that accrues with tenure) is the same.
Does the US have indefinite contracts?
Not in the same sense. The US federal default is at-will employment: either party can terminate at any time, for any lawful reason, with no statutory notice or severance.
Only Montana has departed from the at-will baseline. A US offer letter functions operationally as an indefinite contract, but the statutory floor is far thinner than under any indefinite-default jurisdiction.
How does a fixed-term contract auto-convert to indefinite?
By operation of law when the statutory cap on duration or renewals breaks.
Germany converts under TzBfG §16 after 24 months or 3 renewals. France converts under L1243-13 after 18 months or 2 renewals. Italy converts under Decreto Dignità after 24 months. Brazil converts under CLT 451 after 2 years or 1 renewal. The conversion backdates carry-forward exposure to the original start date.
Can an EOR sign an indefinite contract on my behalf?
Yes. The EOR is the legal employer in the target country and signs the local indefinite contract in the statutory form.
The buyer directs the work and approves substantive decisions (hiring, dismissal, pay). The EOR carries statutory accrual, drafting in the local form, restrictive-covenant adjustment to local enforceability, and the termination procedural route. See the EOR compliance entry for the full responsibility split.
Are non-compete clauses enforceable in indefinite contracts globally?
Enforceability varies sharply. UK and German non-competes are enforceable with garden-leave or compensation.
Italian non-competes require mandatory consideration of 6 to 12 months. Brazilian non-competes are typically narrowed to 30 days post-termination. Indian post-employment restraints are largely unenforceable under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act. EORs draft to the local standard, not the global template.